Skip to main content

The Money Overview

82% of retirees facing Social Security garnishment could stop it by claiming hardship

Roughly four out of five retirees whose Social Security checks are being reduced to cover defaulted student loans qualify for relief they have never claimed. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found that 82 percent of Social Security beneficiaries with student loans in default could stop those reductions by filing a hardship request, yet the vast majority have not done so. With the U.S. Department of Education having delayed new involuntary collections, affected retirees have a shrinking window to act before offsets resume.

How the 82 percent figure was calculated and why it matters right now

The CFPB reached the 82 percent finding through its review of Federal Reserve survey data, drawing on the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking, a nationally representative survey fielded annually since 2013 by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The data showed that the overwhelming share of older borrowers losing a portion of their monthly benefits met the financial thresholds for hardship relief but had never submitted the required paperwork.

The mechanism behind these reductions is the Treasury Offset Program, run by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. When a borrower defaults on a federal student loan, the Department of Education can refer the debt to Treasury, which then withholds part of each Social Security payment until the balance is satisfied. The legal authority for this process sits in federal regulation under 31 CFR Section 285.4, which permits offsets of federal benefit payments to collect past-due nontax debt. Supplemental Security Income is excluded, but standard Social Security retirement and disability benefits are not.

The gap between eligibility and action is the central problem. Retirees who receive targeted outreach about the hardship form shortly after an offset notice are far more likely to file than those who stumble across the information on a general federal website. No public administrative data confirm how many affected beneficiaries have actually submitted hardship requests since the most recent collection delay, which means the 82 percent figure represents potential relief, not realized relief.

GAO findings on older borrowers and permitted relief pathways

The Government Accountability Office documented in its report on older student loan borrowers that many retirees subject to offsets frequently qualify for what the agency calls “permitted relief,” including reductions or full suspensions of offsets based on financial hardship. The report found that program design weaknesses made it difficult for eligible borrowers to obtain that relief, even when they clearly met the criteria. GAO recommended changes to help older borrowers access the process, but operational barriers have persisted.

Borrowers who want to request a suspension can obtain the necessary form through the Department of Education’s Default Resolution Group. The form asks for documentation of income, expenses, and financial hardship. Once approved, the offset can be reduced or paused entirely. The Department of Education has delayed the restart of involuntary collections, giving current retirees additional time to file before new offsets begin. That delay, however, does not help borrowers whose offsets were already in place before the pause took effect.

Unanswered questions about who actually files and what retirees should do first

Key questions remain about which borrowers learn about hardship relief and who follows through. The CFPB analysis relies on survey responses rather than agency records, so it cannot show whether the same individuals who appear eligible on paper ever complete the process. Nor does it capture how often hardship requests are denied, or whether denials reflect genuine ineligibility or confusion about documentation. Without clearer data from the agencies administering offsets, policymakers cannot easily tell whether outreach efforts are reaching the most vulnerable retirees or merely those who are already relatively well informed.

For retirees facing or fearing offsets, the practical steps are more concrete than the data picture. Borrowers should first confirm whether their loans are in default and whether any portion of their Social Security benefit is already being withheld. They can then contact the Default Resolution Group to ask specifically about the financial hardship process and request the appropriate form. According to federal guidance in an Education Department FAQ, borrowers can submit income and expense information to demonstrate that offsets would prevent them from meeting basic needs, and approved requests can lead to temporary or longer-term relief.

Advocates for older borrowers argue that agencies could narrow the gap between eligibility and use of hardship relief by simplifying forms, proactively screening for likely hardship, and embedding clearer explanations in offset notices themselves. Until such changes occur, however, the burden remains on individual retirees to navigate a complex system. With the current pause on new involuntary collections expected to end, the CFPB’s 82 percent estimate underscores both the scale of unclaimed relief and the urgency for eligible Social Security beneficiaries to act before more of their monthly income is withheld.


Free tool for readers: Not sure whether your own retirement is on track? You can check your free Retirement Safety Score — a 0–100 number plus a few personalized steps — in about five minutes, with no sign-up required to see your score.

Avatar photo

Daniel Harper

Daniel is a finance writer covering personal finance topics including budgeting, credit, and beginner investing. He began his career contributing to his Substack, where he covered consumer finance trends and practical money topics for everyday readers. Since then, he has written for a range of personal finance blogs and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, straightforward content that helps readers make more informed financial decisions.​