Thousands of combat-injured military retirees forced out of service for medical reasons stand to gain full access to both their Defense Department pension and their Veterans Affairs disability compensation if the House passes H.R. 2102, the Major Richard Star Act. The bill, now cleared for floor consideration through H. Res. 1247, would eliminate a longstanding dollar-for-dollar offset that reduces retired pay for Chapter 61 disability retirees who also receive VA benefits. A companion measure, S. 1032, carries identical language in the Senate, giving the proposal a bicameral path forward during the 119th Congress.
Why the offset still costs combat-wounded retirees money
Under current law, service members medically retired under Chapter 61 of title 10 face a pay reduction that most other military retirees do not. Two programs, Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments (CRDP) and Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), were created to let qualifying retirees collect both their pension and VA disability pay. But Chapter 61 retirees are capped at a years-of-service calculation that often falls well below their full retired pay, according to the Defense Department. The result is a gap: a veteran seriously injured in combat who served fewer than 20 years can lose a significant share of earned benefits to the offset.
The Congressional Research Service explains that eligible retirees cannot receive both CRDP and CRSC at the same time and must choose whichever program pays more. For Chapter 61 retirees whose disability retirement pay exceeds what a years-of-service formula would yield, the difference is simply forfeited. H.R. 2102 targets that specific inequity by amending sections of title 10, United States Code, to remove the offset entirely for combat-injured retirees.
What H.R. 2102 changes and what CBO projects
The House legislation rewrites the CRDP and CRSC rules so that Chapter 61 retirees with combat-related injuries can receive the full amount of both military retired pay and VA disability compensation. The text specifies the statutory sections being amended and sets no phase-in period, meaning benefits would begin once the law takes effect. It also ties eligibility to the existing definition of combat-related service, preserving the distinction between injuries incurred in combat or hazardous duty and those arising from non-combat conditions.
On the Senate side, the companion bill mirrors the House language, signaling that negotiators in both chambers are aligned on the core policy: ending the offset for medically retired, combat-injured veterans who currently see their disability pay effectively substitute for, rather than supplement, their earned pension. Having identical texts in both chambers reduces the need for a lengthy conference process if either bill advances to final passage.
The Congressional Budget Office published a formal estimate that outlines how the change would increase direct spending over a ten-year window. CBO’s analysis describes the current-law restrictions, notes that many disability retirees now receive less than they would under concurrent receipt, and confirms that the bill alters both CRDP and CRSC eligibility for Chapter 61 disability retirees with combat-related conditions. The office projects higher outlays for both the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs as more retirees qualify to receive full payments from each system.
Neither the CBO estimate nor the bill text, however, breaks down the affected population by service branch, rank, or individual disability rating, leaving the precise number of beneficiaries unspecified in the public record. Without that level of granularity, outside analysts can only approximate how many retirees fall into the narrow category of being medically retired for combat-related reasons, having fewer than 20 years of service, and currently losing money to the offset. The lack of detailed public data also makes it difficult to quantify how much each household’s monthly income would rise if the legislation is enacted.
Potential impact on veterans’ finances and administration
For individual retirees, the most immediate effect of the Major Richard Star Act would be a higher and more predictable monthly income stream. Instead of watching VA disability compensation reduce their military retired pay, eligible veterans would see both payments arrive in full. Advocates argue that this change would better reflect the dual nature of the benefits: retired pay as deferred compensation for years of service, and disability pay as restitution for service-connected injuries.
Administrative changes would also follow. Defense Finance and Accounting Service systems that currently apply the offset would need to be updated to calculate full concurrent receipt for the newly eligible group, while VA payment systems would need to coordinate to avoid duplicate withholdings or erroneous debt notices. Because the statute creates a clear entitlement rather than a discretionary pilot program, agencies would be obligated to implement the new rules uniformly once the effective date arrives.
If the bill becomes law, the hypothesis that Chapter 61 retirees reporting VA debt or delayed payments would decline within 18 months is plausible but not yet testable. No publicly available dataset from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service or the VA currently tracks financial hardship among this specific subgroup in a way that would serve as a clean baseline. For now, the measurable outcomes will be limited to aggregate spending trends and any future reporting Congress may require on how many combat-injured retirees ultimately benefit from the end of the offset.
Free tool for readers: Curious where your retirement stands on a 0–100 scale? You can get your free Retirement Safety Score in about five minutes — no account, no bank details, just your number and a few steps to improve it.
