Surviving spouses of veterans who depend on Dependency and Indemnity Compensation would receive annual payment increases above the standard cost-of-living adjustment, and the most severely disabled veterans would gain a new $833.33 monthly allowance, under legislation the House passed on roll call vote 191. The bill, H.R. 6047, known as the Sharri Briley and Eric Edmundson Veterans Benefits Expansion Act of 2026, was ordered reported on Feb. 12, 2026, and offsets its costs through changes to VA home loan funding fees.
Why DIC and aid-and-attendance increases carry urgency in 2026
The bill addresses two groups that have seen their purchasing power erode. Surviving spouses receiving DIC have historically received cost-of-living adjustments pegged to Social Security, but those adjustments have not kept pace with housing and health care costs that disproportionately affect older survivors. Veterans rated at the highest disability levels and eligible for aid and attendance under special monthly compensation categories have faced similar gaps between their benefits and the actual cost of in-home care.
H.R. 6047 attacks both problems with specific dollar figures. The statutory language creates a supplemental monthly allowance of $833.33 for veterans eligible for aid and attendance under 38 U.S.C. sections 1114(r) or 1114(t), effective Dec. 1, 2026. For DIC recipients, it ties future increases to the Social Security COLA but adds a bump on top: 1.0 percentage point above the Social Security COLA in December 2026, followed by 0.5 percentage point above the COLA in December 2027, according to the CBO budget analysis.
The legislation pays for these expansions by adjusting VA home loan funding fees under 38 U.S.C. section 3729. That tradeoff creates a direct tension: widows and severely disabled veterans gain financial relief, while a separate population of veteran homebuyers absorbs higher upfront costs on VA-backed mortgages. Whether that fee increase would meaningfully reduce loan origination volume among first-time veteran buyers in expensive markets is an open question. The bill text specifies fee changes, but no publicly available analysis quantifies the projected effect on purchase-loan or refinance volume in specific housing markets.
How the $833.33 allowance and DIC add-ons are structured
The new supplemental allowance targets the smallest and most severely impaired group of veterans: those already qualifying for the highest tiers of special monthly compensation. These veterans typically require daily personal attendant care and often cannot perform basic activities without assistance. The $833.33 monthly payment would begin Dec. 1, 2026, and layer on top of existing special monthly compensation rates, which already represent the upper end of VA disability payments.
The DIC increases follow a different structure. Rather than a flat dollar amount, the bill guarantees that surviving spouses receive annual adjustments that exceed whatever Social Security retirees get. In the first year, a widow whose DIC payment would normally rise by, say, 2.5 percent under the standard COLA would instead receive a 3.5 percent increase, reflecting the additional 1.0 percentage point specified in the bill. In the second year, if the underlying COLA were again 2.5 percent, the DIC adjustment would be 3.0 percent, incorporating the extra 0.5 percentage point. After those two years, the bill does not add further explicit premiums above the Social Security COLA, so future adjustments would revert to the baseline formula unless Congress acts again.
Today’s DIC payments are calculated using statutory base rates that are updated annually. VA posts those figures on its official survivor benefit tables, which show how monthly amounts vary based on factors such as dependent children or a surviving spouse’s need for aid and attendance. By layering the enhanced COLA on top of these existing rate structures, H.R. 6047 aims to preserve the purchasing power of survivors without rewriting the underlying eligibility rules.
Who benefits and who pays
The beneficiaries of the new $833.33 allowance are narrowly defined. Veterans eligible under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r) or (t) have already been found to require a level of personal care that goes beyond routine assistance. Many rely on family members or paid caregivers for round-the-clock help with bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. For these households, modest percentage increases in core disability compensation often do not cover the rapidly rising cost of in-home care, especially in regions with tight labor markets for nursing and attendant services. The flat monthly supplement is designed to address that shortfall directly.
Surviving spouses on DIC represent a broader group, but one that is aging and increasingly exposed to inflation in rent, property taxes, and medical out-of-pocket expenses. Because DIC is a flat-rate benefit not tied to the deceased veteran’s rank or length of service, survivors with limited savings can be especially vulnerable when their fixed income fails to keep up with local costs. The enhanced COLA is intended to close part of that gap without converting DIC into an income-tested or geographically adjusted program.
On the cost side, VA home loan funding fees function as an upfront charge on mortgages guaranteed by the department. The bill’s changes would modestly increase those fees for certain categories of borrowers, raising revenue that offsets the new mandatory spending on DIC and special monthly compensation. Policymakers backing the bill argue that the tradeoff is justified because the fee remains financeable into the loan and because many borrowers are exempt, including some disabled veterans. Critics, however, warn that higher fees could discourage marginal buyers or push them toward riskier non-VA products, particularly in high-cost housing markets where every additional dollar in closing costs matters.
Policy implications and next steps
H.R. 6047 illustrates the recurring budget challenge in veterans policy: expanding support for one vulnerable group often requires extracting resources from another. By pairing an enriched DIC COLA and a new allowance for the most disabled veterans with higher home loan fees, the bill tries to stay deficit-neutral while addressing urgent needs in long-term care and survivor income security.
If the measure advances in the Senate, lawmakers will likely face pressure from veterans service organizations to preserve the benefit expansions while reconsidering how they are financed. For now, the House-passed version frames the debate around a clear question: should the cost of better protecting widows and the most severely disabled be borne primarily by future VA homebuyers, or should Congress seek alternative offsets or accept higher overall spending on veterans’ benefits?
Free tool for readers: Built for Americans 55 to 80: a free, plain-English retirement check. See your Retirement Safety Score — your 0–100 number and a few steps — in about five minutes, no account needed.
