Millions of taxpayers who give a few thousand dollars to charity each year lost their ability to claim a federal deduction after the standard deduction nearly doubled starting in 2018. A growing number of those households are fighting back with a simple timing trick: pooling several years of planned gifts into a single contribution to a donor-advised fund, clearing the standard-deduction threshold in one tax year and then taking the standard deduction in the off years. The math is straightforward, but the compliance details and the open questions about who actually benefits deserve a closer look as the current TCJA provisions face a scheduled sunset after 2025.
How the higher standard deduction created a bunching incentive
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act nearly doubled the standard deduction starting in 2018, which meant that a married couple giving $4,000 a year to charity could no longer combine that amount with other deductions and come out ahead by itemizing. The IRS states that taxpayers should itemize on Schedule A only when allowable itemized deductions exceed the standard deduction. For households whose total deductions now fall short of that bar, each annual gift effectively produces zero additional tax savings.
Bunching reverses that outcome by concentrating two, three, or even five years of planned giving into a single calendar year. A donor-advised fund makes the strategy practical because it separates the tax event from the charitable distribution. According to IRS guidance, a charitable contribution is generally deductible in the tax year it is made. Once the money lands in the fund, the donor can recommend grants to specific nonprofits over subsequent years while still claiming the full deduction up front.
The legal structure matters here. The IRS defines a donor-advised fund as a separately identified fund or account maintained by a 501(c)(3) sponsoring organization, and once a donor contributes, the sponsoring organization holds legal control. That transfer of control is what triggers the deduction in the contribution year, even though the money may sit in the fund for months or years before reaching a working charity.
Percentage-of-AGI caps and documentation rules that shape the strategy
Bunching is not unlimited. Federal law under 26 U.S. Code Section 170 sets annual percentage-of-AGI ceilings on how much charitable giving a taxpayer can deduct. Cash gifts to public charities, including most donor-advised fund sponsors, generally face a 60-percent-of-AGI cap, with excess amounts carrying forward up to five years. A household earning $100,000 that bunches $15,000 into one year stays well within that limit, but someone contributing appreciated stock or other non-cash property faces tighter thresholds.
Documentation requirements also tighten with larger gifts. The IRS requires a contemporaneous written acknowledgment for any single contribution of $250 or more, and donors must maintain bank records or comparable documentation for smaller gifts. When using a donor-advised fund, the acknowledgment typically comes from the sponsoring charity, not from each end-recipient, which simplifies recordkeeping but also distances donors from the operating nonprofits they ultimately want to support.
Topic summaries on charitable deductions emphasize that only gifts to qualified organizations count, and that taxpayers must reduce their deduction if they receive goods or services in return. Those rules apply equally to bunching strategies: a contribution routed through a donor-advised fund is deductible only to the extent that it represents a true gift, without tickets, memberships, or other benefits attached.
Who actually benefits from bunching with donor-advised funds?
The bunching approach primarily helps households that straddle the line between standard and itemized deductions. A family that would give $4,000 a year to charity and has another $16,000 in other itemized deductions might fall short of the standard deduction in most years. By contributing $12,000 to a donor-advised fund every third year, that same family could itemize in the contribution year and then revert to the standard deduction in the intervening years, increasing the total value of their deductions over the three-year cycle.
Higher-income taxpayers with substantial mortgage interest, state and local taxes up to the statutory cap, and other deductions may already itemize every year. For them, bunching may still offer advantages when they expect income to fluctuate-for example, in a year with a large bonus, business sale, or Roth conversion that pushes them into a higher marginal bracket. Concentrating charitable gifts in those high-income years can maximize the tax value of the deduction, even if they continue itemizing in the off years.
Lower- and middle-income households, however, may find that bunching offers limited benefit if they lack the cash flow to pre-fund several years of giving or if their total deductions remain below the standard deduction even after pooling contributions. In those cases, the donor-advised fund structure may still provide convenience and the ability to invest charitable dollars, but the tax savings may be modest or nonexistent.
Planning around the 2025 sunset and practical trade-offs
The scheduled expiration of the current TCJA provisions after 2025 adds another wrinkle. If the standard deduction shrinks or other itemized-deduction rules change, the value of bunching could shift quickly. Taxpayers considering large donor-advised fund contributions in the next few years may want to model scenarios under both current law and potential post-sunset frameworks, recognizing that Congress could extend, modify, or allow the provisions to lapse.
Beyond the tax calculations, there are practical trade-offs. Donor-advised funds typically charge administrative fees and may limit grant recommendations to certain types of organizations or minimum amounts. The separation between the deduction event and the ultimate charitable impact can also encourage donors to delay distributions, leaving money parked in accounts instead of reaching operating charities promptly. For taxpayers who are comfortable with those constraints and who can navigate the documentation and percentage-of-AGI rules, bunching charitable gifts into a donor-advised fund remains a powerful, if imperfect, response to the post-TCJA landscape.
Free for readers: The free Retirement Shield newsletter sends plain-English help keeping more of your money in retirement — the scams to dodge, the benefits you’re owed, and what’s changing with Social Security and Medicare, a couple times a week. Get the free newsletter.
