Older Americans reported losing $2.4 billion to fraud in 2024, and two of the schemes that hit them hardest, the grandparent scam and the romance scam, together drain hundreds of millions of dollars a year from people over 60. Both run on manufactured urgency, a grandchild supposedly in a jail cell or a long-distance partner in a sudden crisis, and both tend to collapse the moment the target stops and independently verifies the story. The dollars at stake, and the single phone call that protects them, are the reason this belongs in the money column and not merely on a list of safety tips.
The dollars behind the grandparent and romance scripts
The losses are large and climbing. The Federal Trade Commission’s most recent annual report to Congress recorded $2.4 billion in reported fraud losses among adults 60 and older for 2024, four times the roughly $600 million logged in 2020. Because most victims never file a report, the agency estimates the true figure runs far higher, but even the reported total makes older-adult fraud a multibillion-dollar problem concentrated in a handful of schemes.
Romance and confidence fraud sits near the top of that list. The FTC’s guidance on romance scams describes relationships that are engineered over weeks or months before any request for money appears, and older adults consistently report some of the largest per-victim losses in this category, cumulatively in the hundreds of millions. The scammer builds trust first, then invents an emergency, a customs fee, a medical bill, a blocked bank account, that only a wire, gift card, or crypto transfer can solve.
The grandparent scam is the family-emergency version of the same playbook. As the agency’s grandparent-scam guidance lays out, a caller poses as a grandchild, or a lawyer or officer acting for one, claims an arrest or accident, and pleads for cash before anyone else finds out. The secrecy is the tell: the caller insists the target tell no one, precisely because a second phone call would end the scheme.
What makes both schemes so costly is that they target judgment, not gullibility. The victims are frequently careful people who would never wire money to a stranger on a whim but who freeze when told a grandchild is hurt, or when a monthslong relationship suddenly hinges on a single transfer. The emotional setup is the real product; the payment request is only the final step, and by the time it arrives the target has usually stopped questioning the story. That is why losses climb into the hundreds of millions even among people who consider themselves scam-savvy.
Free retirement updates: Want plain-English help keeping more of your money in retirement? The free Retirement Shield newsletter covers the benefits, deadlines, and money mistakes that cost retirees, a couple times a week. Subscribe free.
Why a verify-first call defeats both
The countermeasure costs nothing and works on both scripts: stop, hang up, and confirm the story through a known contact before any money moves. For a supposed grandchild in trouble, that means calling the grandchild directly, or a parent, on a number already saved, rather than the one the caller provided. Scammers now clone voices with recorded audio, so a familiar-sounding voice on an incoming call is no longer proof of anything.
For a romance approach, the same discipline applies in slower motion. The FTC’s data spotlight on how scammers drain older adults’ savings notes that a partner who will not meet in person, then asks for money, is following a well-worn pattern regardless of how genuine the messages feel. A reverse image search on the person’s photos and a refusal to send funds to anyone never met face to face close off most of the risk.
The payment method is often the clearest warning of all. Requests for gift cards, wire transfers, cryptocurrency, or cash couriered to an address share one trait: once the money is sent, it is nearly impossible to claw back. A legitimate emergency almost never requires payment in those specific forms, and a demand for them is reason enough to pause and verify.
Banks and gift-card retailers have added their own friction, training tellers and cashiers to ask questions when an older customer suddenly buys thousands of dollars in gift cards or tries to wire money overseas. Those prompts stop some losses, but a coached victim often talks past them, because the scammer has already scripted an answer for the cashier’s question. That is exactly why the verification has to come from the target’s own trusted contacts rather than from the person on the other end of the call.
How the money leaves, and where to report it
Contact increasingly begins on social media and messaging apps, where reported losses have risen sharply as scammers move conversations from a friendly comment to a private chat to a payment request. The channels that make the money hard to recover, crypto and gift cards, are the same ones that let a stranger reach a target instantly, which is why the losses per victim have grown even as awareness has spread.
Speed matters after the fact. A victim who acts within hours can sometimes reverse a wire or freeze a transfer, and reporting the fraud to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and to the bank quickly gives investigators a chance to trace the funds and warn others. The report also feeds the data that drives the agency’s warnings each year.
None of the recovery steps, though, are as reliable as the pause that prevents the loss. The grandparent scam and the romance scam both depend on a target who acts before checking, and the verify-first call is the cheapest insurance an older household can carry against a scheme designed to empty an account before anyone thinks to ask a second person.
This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed against primary sources by The Money Overview editorial team.
More Financial Reading
