Every other tax-advantaged retirement account eventually forces the owner’s hand: traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, and similar plans require withdrawals starting at age 73, whether or not the owner needs the money. A Roth IRA is the exception. According to the IRS, an account owner can leave the entire balance untouched for the rest of their life, growing tax-free with no minimum withdrawal ever required — a structural difference that turns the Roth into one of the few retirement accounts genuinely built to be passed down rather than drawn down.
The rule that sets Roth accounts apart
Owners of traditional IRAs, SEP IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, and most employer retirement plans generally must start taking required minimum distributions by age 73, calculated each year against the account balance and a life-expectancy table, regardless of whether the owner actually needs the income. Skipping or shorting that withdrawal carries a real cost: a 25 percent excise tax on the amount that should have come out, reduced to 10 percent if corrected within two years.
Roth IRAs sit outside that entire system. The IRS states plainly that a Roth IRA owner can leave amounts in the account as long as they live, and the required-minimum-distribution rules confirm the same thing from the other direction: account owners aren’t required to take withdrawals from Roth IRAs, or from designated Roth accounts in a 401(k) or 403(b) plan, while they’re alive. An owner can also keep contributing to a Roth IRA past the age most people associate with slowing down retirement savings, as long as they still have qualifying compensation — there’s no upper age cutoff on adding new money the way there once was for traditional IRAs.
That combination — no forced withdrawals and no upper age limit on new contributions — means a Roth IRA can function less like a spending account and more like a standing store of tax-free growth for as long as the original owner is alive, untouched by the calendar-driven withdrawal schedule that governs every other major type of retirement account.
The same exemption extends to designated Roth accounts held inside an employer’s 401(k) or 403(b) plan, not just a standalone Roth IRA, which matters for anyone who has been contributing to a Roth option through their workplace rather than opening an account on their own. Whether the tax-free money sits in a Roth IRA or a designated Roth account inside an employer plan, the account owner faces the identical lifetime rule: no required withdrawal at any age while they’re alive.
Free retirement updates: One number can cost or save hundreds a month in retirement. The free Retirement Shield newsletter surfaces the ones worth knowing. Sign up free.
What happens to that flexibility after the owner dies
The no-RMD advantage is specific to the original owner — it does not carry over intact to whoever inherits the account. The IRS is explicit that beneficiaries of Roth IRAs are subject to the required minimum distribution rules, even though the original owner never faced one. The lifetime exemption effectively pauses the clock rather than stopping it permanently.
For most heirs who aren’t the account owner’s spouse, that clock runs on a 10-year schedule: the inherited Roth IRA generally has to be fully distributed by the end of the tenth year following the original owner’s death, under the IRS’s beneficiary distribution rules. A surviving spouse, a minor child of the original owner, a disabled or chronically ill beneficiary, or someone not more than 10 years younger than the original owner can qualify for different, often more flexible treatment instead of the flat 10-year window. Within that 10-year period for an inherited Roth, there’s no requirement to take out a specific amount in any particular year — the beneficiary can spread withdrawals evenly, wait until the final year, or take irregular amounts, as long as the account is empty by the deadline.
Why the distinction changes how the account gets used
The practical effect is that a Roth IRA’s tax-free growth compounds without interruption for however long the original owner lives, then compounds for up to another decade under the heir’s more flexible — but not unlimited — withdrawal timeline. That’s a meaningfully longer runway than a traditional IRA offers, where required withdrawals start chipping away at the balance, and the taxable income they generate, well before death in most cases.
The tradeoff is that “grow untouched for heirs” describes decades of potential compounding during the owner’s lifetime, not an indefinite dynasty account. The 10-year rule for most beneficiaries means the money the original owner never had to touch still has a hard deadline once it changes hands — the flexibility Roth accounts offer is real, but it belongs to a specific person for a specific period, not to the account itself in perpetuity.
That structure creates a genuine planning choice for anyone deciding how to spend down retirement assets during their own lifetime. An owner who draws first from a traditional account already facing forced withdrawals, while leaving a Roth balance untouched for as long as possible, maximizes the years the Roth spends compounding tax-free before an heir’s 10-year clock ever starts running. The order in which different account types get spent isn’t dictated by the rules themselves, but the rules make clear which account rewards patience and which one doesn’t.
This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
More Financial Reading
