Skip to main content

The Money Overview

The housing allowance a nursing home spouse can keep rose to $811.50 in July

Every July 1, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services resets a pair of linked dollar figures that decide how much income the spouse of a Medicaid nursing-home resident is allowed to keep before the rest of that income is redirected toward the cost of care. This year the community spouse monthly housing allowance rose to $811.50 in every state except Alaska and Hawaii, where separate calculations put it at $1,014.38 and $933.38. The increase is modest against actual housing costs, but it sits inside a larger federal ceiling that determines how much of a couple’s combined income can be split at all. Neither figure is set by a state; both come from the same annual federal recalculation.

How the July Adjustment Is Actually Calculated

CMS set the 2026 community spouse monthly housing allowance at $811.50 for every state but Alaska and Hawaii, effective July 1, 2026, according to the agency’s informational bulletin issued April 27, 2026. The same bulletin ties the change to a broader recalculation CMS performs every July under Section 1924 of the Social Security Act, the 1988 statute that created Medicaid’s spousal impoverishment protections so that one spouse’s need for nursing-home care would not force the other into poverty. Alaska and Hawaii are adjusted separately because federal poverty guidelines for those two states have always been calculated on their own schedule, independent of the 48 contiguous states.

The housing figure is not an independent number. CMS calculates it as a fixed 30 percent of the minimum monthly maintenance needs allowance, the separate figure that caps how much income can be diverted from the institutionalized spouse to the one remaining at home. That minimum allowance rose to $2,705.00 in July, up from $2,643.75 the year before; the May 2025 version of the same standards chart shows that lower maintenance figure producing the prior $793.13 housing allowance under the identical 30 percent formula. Because the two numbers move on a fixed ratio, the housing allowance can only rise when the maintenance allowance rises, and by exactly the same proportion.

That link back to 1988 matters because the spousal impoverishment rules were written to solve a specific problem: before the law existed, a couple could be required to spend down nearly all of their combined income and assets before Medicaid would pay for one spouse’s nursing-home stay, often leaving the spouse who stayed home with next to nothing. Congress responded by creating protected allowances tied to objective, annually updated federal benchmarks rather than to a caseworker’s discretion or a state’s own budget pressures. The housing allowance is one of the smaller pieces of that structure, but it is adjusted on the same clock and under the same statutory authority as the rest.


Free renewal checklist: One missing document can end Medicaid coverage at renewal, even for someone still eligible. Build the renewal packet with the free checklist.

Why Alaska and Hawaii Run on a Different Scale

Alaska and Hawaii do not receive a simple percentage bump layered on top of the standard figures. Both states are assigned their own minimum monthly maintenance needs allowances under federal poverty guidelines that have always been calculated separately for those two states — $3,381.25 in Alaska and $3,111.25 in Hawaii for the year beginning July 1, 2026, according to the same 2026 standards chart, mirrored through HHS. Run through the identical 30 percent formula used everywhere else, those baselines produce the $1,014.38 and $933.38 housing allowances rather than the $811.50 rate that applies in the other 48 states.

The gap between the highest and lowest housing allowance nationwide is just over $200 a month, a difference that tracks poorly against the actual cost of maintaining a home in Anchorage or Honolulu compared with much of the contiguous United States. It is, however, the only regional variation built into the federal formula; every other input into the spousal impoverishment calculation, including the resource allowances and home equity limits, applies uniformly regardless of a state’s cost of living. A community spouse in a high-cost mainland metro area is held to the same $811.50 standard as one in a rural county with far lower housing costs.

The housing allowance also is not a payment that arrives automatically once a spouse qualifies. It functions as a ceiling that a state caseworker applies only when a spouse’s documented shelter costs — rent or mortgage, property taxes, homeowner’s or renter’s insurance, and standard utility charges — exceed a baseline shelter standard built into the same worksheet. A spouse with shelter costs below that baseline receives no addition at all, while one whose verified costs exceed it can have the difference added to the minimum monthly maintenance needs allowance only up to the capped amount now set at $811.50, or the higher regional figure in Alaska and Hawaii.

The Ceiling That Matters More Than the Housing Number

For most couples, the housing allowance is not what decides whether nursing-home Medicaid is available at all. That threshold runs through the community spouse resource allowance, which lets the at-home spouse retain between $32,532 and $162,660 in countable assets depending on what the couple owned when the institutionalized spouse was first admitted to a facility or began receiving long-term services. Home equity limits now range from $752,000 to $1,130,000, and the maximum monthly maintenance needs allowance sits at $4,066.50 — all three figures far larger in practical consequence than the roughly $18 increase to the housing allowance that made this year’s update newsworthy.

Those larger figures are not adjusted in July at all. The community spouse resource allowance, the home equity limits and the maximum maintenance allowance are set every January, in line with the Consumer Price Index, while only the minimum maintenance allowance and the housing figure derived from it move again each July under the separate statutory schedule tied to the federal poverty level. A couple applying for nursing-home Medicaid in the second half of the year is working from two different sets of numbers published six months apart, calculated under two different formulas, inside the same eligibility determination.

None of these adjustments arrive as a public rule with a comment period attached. CMS communicates them to state Medicaid directors through an informational bulletin, and each state is then responsible for updating its own eligibility software and caseworker guidance before the new figures take effect. A state slow to update its systems could still apply the prior $793.13 housing standard past the July 1 effective date, understating what a community spouse is legally entitled to keep — a lag that, for a household already navigating a nursing-home placement, matters more than the size of the increase itself.


Nursing-Home Medicaid and the Spouse at Home

The allowances described above only matter once a couple’s Medicaid case is open and stays open, and staying open depends on a paperwork cycle separate from the shelter and income formulas covered here. Renewal packets for long-term care Medicaid typically ask for updated bank statements, proof of income, verification of nursing-facility status and, in some states, a fresh accounting of the community spouse’s resources — documents that have nothing to do with the housing allowance itself but can end coverage if any one of them is missing. A case that is closed for an incomplete renewal has to be reopened from scratch, regardless of how correctly the housing and income allowances were calculated the first time.

The SNAP & Medicaid Renewal Organizer is a 13-page organizer built around 51 state packs, a renewal document checklist and a renewal and reporting calendar that covers the 90-day window after coverage is dropped.

See the state-specific renewal checklist and the 90-day reinstatement window in The SNAP & Medicaid Renewal Organizer.

This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of AI and reviewed by The Money Overview editorial team.

Avatar photo

Daniel Harper

Daniel is a finance writer covering personal finance topics including budgeting, credit, and beginner investing. He began his career contributing to his Substack, where he covered consumer finance trends and practical money topics for everyday readers. Since then, he has written for a range of personal finance blogs and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, straightforward content that helps readers make more informed financial decisions.​


One benefit, tax, or Medicare change explained every weekday — plain English, real numbers. Get the free brief.

Free from RetireShield — one short email each weekday. Unsubscribe anytime. We never ask for your password, bank login, or Social Security number.