Skip to main content

The Money Overview

States may excuse the Medicaid work rule in counties where unemployment reaches 8 percent or 1.5 times the national rate

A single sentence buried inside a federal fact sheet decides whether a hospital stay, a disaster declaration, or a weak local job market can pause someone’s Medicaid work-requirement clock. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services built four short-term hardship exceptions into its new Medicaid work rule: hospitalization or nursing-facility care, a presidentially declared disaster, a high-unemployment county, and extended medical travel. None of the four switches on by default; CMS wrote all four as a state option. A Medicaid enrollee can lean on a county’s 8 percent unemployment rate to satisfy the work requirement only if that enrollee’s own state chose to offer the exception.

Four Hardship Exceptions, One Catch: They’re Optional

CMS built two separate layers of relief into the rule, and the difference between them decides who is protected no matter what a state does. Nine categories of adults, including former foster care youth, pregnant and postpartum beneficiaries, veterans with a total disability rating, and parents or caretakers of a child 13 or younger, are exempt outright in every one of the 43 states and the District of Columbia that must run the program. Short-term hardship exceptions are a narrower, separate mechanism, and they exist only where a state chooses to adopt them.

Where a state elects to offer them, the exceptions do not remove a person from the work requirement; they let that person be treated as meeting it for the month. CMS’s fact sheet describes short-term hardship exceptions as letting an individual be “considered as meeting the work requirement,” and it names four circumstances a state may cover: receiving inpatient hospital or nursing-facility services, residing in a county where the President has declared an emergency or disaster, residing in a county with a high unemployment rate, and traveling outside one’s community for an extended period for serious or complex medical care, for the beneficiary or a dependent.

The four exceptions map onto genuinely different situations, and CMS wrote them broadly enough to cover more than the label on each one implies. The medical-travel exception is not limited to the beneficiary alone; a parent whose child needs specialized treatment two counties over, or a spouse coordinating a relative’s nursing-facility stay, can also qualify a household for relief where a state’s policy extends that far. The disaster exception hinges on a presidential declaration rather than a state or local one, meaning a county flooded or burned but never elevated to a federal disaster designation would not trigger the exception even where a state has otherwise adopted it.


Inside the organizer: 51 state packs, a renewal document checklist, a renewal and reporting calendar, and the 90-day window after coverage is dropped. Open The SNAP & Medicaid Renewal Organizer.

Where the 8 Percent Threshold Comes From

CMS defines a high-unemployment county using a single test with two ways to pass it. The fact sheet describes the qualifying condition as “a county with an unemployment rate at or above 8% or 1.5 times the national average,” so a county qualifies if it clears either number, not both. The second half of that test moves with the economy: as the national unemployment rate rises, 1.5 times that rate rises with it, which means the bar a county has to clear is not fixed the way the 8 percent figure is.

That threshold sits alongside, not instead of, the ordinary ways to satisfy the work requirement. Adults subject to the rule can still document 80 hours a month of work, community service, or a qualifying program, enroll in school at least half time, or show monthly income of at least 80 times the federal minimum wage, which comes to 580 dollars a month in 2026. A county’s high unemployment rate does not lower that baseline for anyone; where a state adopts the exception, it only excuses a beneficiary from having to hit the baseline for the months the county actually qualifies.

The hardship exceptions carry the same legal status as the rest of the rule. CMS issued the underlying regulation, docketed as CMS-2454-IFC, as an interim final rule with a comment period effective July 31, 2026, and published a correction to it on June 29, 2026, rather than as a draft awaiting a vote. States still have until January 1, 2027 to have the full framework running, including whichever hardship exceptions they decide to adopt, and CMS’s comment period means portions of how the exceptions are administered could still be refined before that deadline arrives.

What Happens When a State Skips the Exceptions

Where a state does not adopt the hardship exceptions, an enrollee facing the exact same circumstances gets nothing extra. A hospitalized beneficiary, a household in a disaster county, or someone traveling for cancer treatment still has to meet the work requirement through one of the ordinary paths, or through one of the nine federal exemption categories if they happen to qualify for one of those instead. CMS’s rule leaves that choice entirely to each state; nothing in the federal framework requires a state to offer any of the four hardships, and nothing in the fact sheet suggests CMS expects every state to adopt all four.

The stakes of that state-by-state gap show up at renewal. States must verify compliance at application and again at every renewal, and if a state cannot confirm someone met the requirement, or qualifies for an exemption or an adopted hardship exception, it has to send a notice of noncompliance and give that person 30 calendar days to prove otherwise. Missing that window can mean a denied application or a lost renewal, though CMS’s framework lets anyone who loses coverage that way reapply immediately, with eligibility reassessed from the new application date forward.

CMS frames the broader rule as a workforce measure rather than a coverage cut. CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz said the rule “helps Americans build skills and independence through work, education, job training, or community service,” language that assumes qualifying activity is available to find. The four hardship exceptions exist for the months that assumption breaks down: a hospital bed, a declared disaster, a county with no jobs to find, or a health crisis that requires leaving town. Whether that safety valve exists for a given beneficiary depends entirely on which of the 43 states plus the District of Columbia decided to build it into their own program.

None of that discretion is spelled out anywhere a beneficiary is likely to see it before a compliance notice arrives. The fact sheet lists the four hardship exceptions in the same section as the nine federal exemptions, with no flag distinguishing a guaranteed protection from one a particular state may never adopt, and the CMS regulation does not require a state to publish which hardships it has chosen before the January 1, 2027 rollout begins. The distinction that matters most to someone facing the requirement, automatic versus optional, is the one the rule itself makes hardest to see.


Asking for an Exception a State Has to Grant

Whether a hardship exception applies to a given household is not something CMS publishes state by state, and nothing above can tell a specific beneficiary whether their own state adopted any of the four. What a state’s Medicaid agency does publish, such as a renewal notice or a redetermination deadline, arrives on its own schedule, with no cross-reference to hospitalization dates, disaster declarations, or a county’s unemployment rate.

The SNAP & Medicaid Renewal Organizer is a 13-page organizer built around 51 state packs and a renewal and reporting calendar.

Compare a household’s own renewal dates against the calendar in The SNAP & Medicaid Renewal Organizer.

This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of AI and reviewed by The Money Overview editorial team.

Avatar photo

Daniel Harper

Daniel is a finance writer covering personal finance topics including budgeting, credit, and beginner investing. He began his career contributing to his Substack, where he covered consumer finance trends and practical money topics for everyday readers. Since then, he has written for a range of personal finance blogs and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, straightforward content that helps readers make more informed financial decisions.​