Skip to main content

The Money Overview

Big banks have cut overdraft fees toward $5 and now need your okay before charging one, so that old $35 hit may be avoidable

Checking-account holders at the largest U.S. banks could soon see overdraft charges drop from roughly $35 to as little as $5, but only if they understand the consent rules that now govern those fees. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau finalized a rule targeting overdraft lending at financial institutions with more than $10 billion in assets, giving those banks a clear set of options: cap fees near $5, charge a fee that reflects actual costs and losses, or treat overdraft credit like any other loan and follow federal lending laws. The shift means the old flat $35 penalty is no longer the default for customers who know their rights.

How the CFPB’s $5 overdraft benchmark changes the math

The CFPB’s overdraft regulation redefines how very large banks can price overdraft transactions. Under the old framework, banks treated overdraft fees as a service charge rather than a credit product, which let them set prices well above their actual cost of covering a negative balance. The new rule closes that gap by treating most overdrafts as extensions of credit unless the fee stays small or reflects documented costs and losses.

For consumers, the practical effect is straightforward. A bank that wants to keep things simple can adopt the roughly $5 benchmark. A bank that believes its costs justify a higher charge must show the math. And a bank that wants to keep generating profit from overdraft lending must comply with the same disclosure, billing, and dispute-resolution rules that apply to credit cards and personal loans. The CFPB framed the change as closing a loophole that had cost Americans billions in fees.

Separate from the fee cap, existing Regulation E already requires banks to obtain affirmative consent before charging overdraft fees on ATM withdrawals and one-time debit card purchases. A CFPB circular issued in 2024 reinforced that banks must give customers a reasonable opportunity to opt in and cannot enroll them through buried disclosures or confusing processes. Customers who never opted in should not be paying overdraft fees on those transactions at all.

Enforcement signals from the Atlantic Union Bank penalty

The consent requirement is not theoretical. The CFPB ordered Atlantic Union Bank to pay $6.2 million after finding the institution had charged overdraft fees without proper customer consent. The agency described the practice as illegal fee harvesting, a term that signals how regulators view banks that collect overdraft revenue from customers who did not clearly agree to the service.

That enforcement action carries weight beyond a single bank. It establishes a public record showing that regulators are willing to pursue penalties when opt-in procedures fall short. For account holders at other large institutions, the case offers a concrete reference point: if a bank charged overdraft fees without a clear, affirmative choice, regulators may see that as an unfair or deceptive practice rather than a routine charge.

Atlantic Union Bank’s case also illustrates how small procedural missteps can have large financial consequences. If a bank relies on pre-checked boxes, vague language, or bundled consents that do not clearly isolate overdraft coverage, regulators may later decide that customers never truly opted in. The resulting penalties can include refunds to affected consumers, civil money penalties, and mandated changes to internal compliance systems.

What large-bank customers should review now

For consumers, the combination of the new rule and recent enforcement means it is a good time to audit how your account handles overdrafts. Start by checking whether you ever affirmatively opted in to overdraft coverage for ATM and one-time debit card transactions. This consent is usually captured on a separate form or a distinct screen in online or mobile banking, not buried in the general account agreement.

If you do not recall opting in, review your account-opening documents or ask your bank for a record of your overdraft election. If the bank cannot produce clear evidence that you agreed, yet you have been charged overdraft fees on debit card purchases or ATM withdrawals, you may have grounds to dispute those charges. The Atlantic Union enforcement makes it harder for banks to claim that ambiguous consent is good enough.

Next, look at how often you incur overdraft fees and for what amounts. Under the CFPB’s new framework, a fee that is many times larger than the underlying transaction will be harder for banks to justify unless they can show that it reflects genuine costs and losses. If your bank continues to charge high, flat fees, you can ask whether it plans to adopt the low-fee benchmark, switch to a cost-based model, or treat overdrafts as a formal credit product with full loan disclosures.

Consumers who frequently overdraw may also want to compare alternatives. Some banks offer low-balance alerts, automatic transfers from savings, or small-dollar lines of credit that can be cheaper than repeated overdraft charges. While the new rule aims to curb excessive fees, it does not eliminate the risk that chronic overdrafters will pay more than they expect if they do not change how they manage their accounts.

Preparing for a new overdraft landscape

The CFPB’s overhaul of overdraft lending at very large institutions is likely to reshape how banks design checking accounts, market overdraft services, and communicate with customers. Some may move quickly to adopt the low-fee benchmark as a competitive selling point, while others may choose to reframe overdraft coverage as a credit product and emphasize flexibility instead of price.

Regardless of how individual banks respond, the direction of travel is clear: overdraft revenue that depends on consumer confusion or passive enrollment is increasingly risky. Customers who understand their right to opt in-or stay out-of fee-based overdraft programs will be better positioned to avoid unnecessary charges and to challenge fees that were never properly authorized.

Free for readers: The free Retirement Shield newsletter sends plain-English help keeping more of your money in retirement — the scams to dodge, the benefits you’re owed, and what’s changing with Social Security and Medicare, a couple times a week. Get the free newsletter.