A collector who hints at a lawsuit over an old debt is on shaky legal ground once the statute of limitations has run out. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Regulation F says a debt collector “must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt.” A CFPB advisory opinion effective May 1, 2023 applies the same bar to suing or threatening to sue.
What Regulation F says about expired debts
Regulation F is the CFPB’s rule implementing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and the text of section 1006.26(b) carries the prohibition on legal actions and threats of legal actions. It defines a time-barred debt as one for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired.
The one carve-out in that paragraph is narrow. The bar does not apply to proofs of claim a collector files in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding. Outside of bankruptcy, the rule leaves no exception for a letter that hints at a lawsuit, which is the form most of these threats take.
The rule is not new. The CFPB’s Regulation F debt collection rule took effect on November 30, 2021. It revised 12 CFR part 1006, which implements the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and covers communications and prohibitions on harassment, false statements and unfair practices.
The May 2023 advisory opinion
The CFPB issued its advisory opinion on April 26, 2023. It appeared in the Federal Register on May 1, 2023, at 88 FR 26475, and took effect that day. The CFPB’s page says the law and Regulation F prohibit a debt collector from suing or threatening to sue to collect a time-barred debt.
The opinion’s example was the so-called zombie mortgage. The agency said a covered debt collector that brings or threatens a state court foreclosure action on a time-barred mortgage debt may violate both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Regulation F.
What changed this year: Social Security and Medicare change every year, and nobody sends you a memo. The Retirement Money Brief breaks down what changed and what to do. Bonus when you subscribe: our Bank, Debt & Protected-Benefit Checkup.
Get the Brief and the bank checkup →
We may earn a commission from links on this page.
In its announcement, the CFPB described these loans as second mortgages that consumers believed were satisfied long ago. Many were 80/20 “piggyback” loans, with a first lien covering 80 percent of the home’s value and a second lien the remaining 20 percent. Lenders often sold the second mortgage to collectors for pennies on the dollar.
Years later, the agency said, some collectors demand the balance, interest and fees and threaten foreclosure. CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said at the time: “We are making clear that threatening to sue to collect on expired zombie mortgage debt is illegal.” That statement dates from 2023, under the director then in office.
Chopra also said some debt collectors who sat silent for a decade are now pursuing homeowners on zombie mortgages. The pattern the CFPB described is a long gap, then a sudden demand that adds interest and fees to a balance many borrowers thought was settled, backed by a warning of foreclosure.
The CFPB said the prohibition applies even if the collector does not know the debt is time-barred. It also said many people and firms that collect defaulted mortgages, and many attorneys who bring foreclosure actions for them, are covered by the law.
Who is covered and who enforces
The protection reaches debt collectors as the statute and the regulation define them. That wording matters, because it ties the bar to the collector’s role and not to the type of debt.
Enforcement runs through two channels, according to the agency. The CFPB and state attorneys general can act against violators, and the bureau said it would monitor the market for violations involving time-barred mortgages and other time-barred debt.
Consumers can file a complaint about zombie mortgages or time-barred debt at consumerfinance.gov/complaint or by calling (855) 411-2372. Those are the contact points the CFPB gave when it announced the opinion.
The two documents work together. Regulation F, effective since late 2021, sets the general bar in section 1006.26(b). The 2023 advisory opinion, in force since May 1 of that year, tells covered collectors how the CFPB reads that bar when the debt is a mortgage and the threat is a foreclosure filing.
Nothing in the CFPB’s pages says a time-barred debt disappears. The statute of limitations limits what a collector can do in court. A letter, a call or a mention of a lawsuit on a debt past that limit is the conduct the rule and the opinion target.
The CFPB’s pages do not give a number of years. They tie the bar to the applicable statute of limitations, so a letter that names a lawsuit on a debt older than that limit is the situation the rule addresses. A letter on a debt still inside the limit is a different matter, and the bar does not reach it.
That leaves the question a household faces when the envelope arrives: whether the debt is actually past the limit. The CFPB’s pages define the term and set the consequence, but the date on which a given debt expires depends on the statute of limitations that applies.
Is a collector calling about an old debt?
A collector’s threat to sue works when the household cannot tell whether the debt is past the statute of limitations. Paying or answering on the spot, without the date or the paperwork in hand, hands the collector the leverage.
The Bank Account & Debt Protection Kit includes the debt-validation steps and a debt inventory, call log and deadline tracker. Part 5, Old Debt and the Clock, covers how a collector’s claim lines up with the calendar.
More Financial Reading
- 21 Ways to Stretch a $2,087 Social Security Check
- 15 Places to Find Your Share of the $4.25 Billion States Give Back
- 15 Ways Retirees Are Tapping a Record $14.9 Trillion in Home Equity
This article was produced with AI assistance and edited for accuracy against the sources linked above.
