Inheriting a parent’s individual retirement account once came with a comfortable pace: an heir could stretch withdrawals across a lifetime and let the balance grow for decades. That era is over. Most non-spouse beneficiaries now have to empty an inherited IRA within ten years, and under the final rules the government issued, many of them also owe a mandatory withdrawal in each of those years rather than waiting until the end. The compressed timetable can push a substantial sum into a beneficiary’s taxable income during the exact years they can least afford it.
The ten-year deadline that replaced the stretch
The old approach, often called the stretch IRA, let a beneficiary base annual withdrawals on their own life expectancy, spreading the tax hit thinly across many years. The SECURE Act ended that for most heirs who inherit after 2019, substituting a hard ten-year window. By the close of the tenth year following the original owner’s death, the entire account must be drained, whatever remains inside it.
The rule reaches most adult children, siblings, friends, and other non-spouse heirs. A narrow group of “eligible designated beneficiaries,” including a surviving spouse, a minor child of the owner, someone chronically ill or disabled, and an heir less than roughly ten years younger than the deceased, can still stretch distributions or use other timelines. The IRS guidance on required distributions for IRA beneficiaries lays out which heirs fall into which category, a determination that controls how quickly the money must come out.
A minor child of the account owner sits in an unusual spot. That child can stretch distributions over their life expectancy, but only until reaching the age of majority, at which point the ten-year clock begins and the balance must be gone a decade later. The carve-out does not extend to grandchildren or to a minor who is not the owner’s own child, so families that assumed a young heir would enjoy decades of tax deferral often discover the window is far shorter than they expected.
Free retirement updates: Want plain-English help keeping more of your money in retirement? The free Retirement Shield newsletter covers the benefits, deadlines, and money mistakes that cost retirees, a couple times a week. Subscribe free.
When an annual withdrawal is required inside the window
For years after the law passed, many heirs assumed the ten-year rule meant they could leave the account alone and withdraw everything in the final year. The final regulations closed that reading. Whether annual distributions are required turns on one fact: whether the original owner had already begun taking their own required minimum distributions before dying.
If the owner died after reaching the age at which their required minimum distributions had started, the beneficiary must take a withdrawal in each of years one through nine and empty the rest by year ten. If the owner died before that point, the heir can skip the annual withdrawals and simply clear the account by the deadline. The distinction sounds technical, but it decides whether a beneficiary can concentrate the tax bill or must absorb it in installments.
Inherited Roth accounts follow a gentler version of the same clock. A Roth IRA passed to a non-spouse heir still has to be emptied within ten years, but because the original owner never faced lifetime distributions, annual withdrawals are not required along the way. The tax treatment of those designated Roth accounts means the distributions are generally tax-free, so the ten-year rule limits the tax-free growth without creating an income shock.
The tax squeeze on heirs in their peak years
The financial sting of the ten-year rule is that inherited traditional IRA money counts as ordinary income when it comes out. Many heirs inherit in their forties, fifties, or early sixties, precisely when their own earnings are highest, so a forced withdrawal can land in a top tax bracket and even lift a filer into a higher one. Compressing decades of deferred taxes into a single decade magnifies that effect.
Spreading withdrawals evenly across the window, rather than taking a lump sum at the end, can soften the blow by keeping each year’s income lower, though the right pace depends on a beneficiary’s other earnings and how those are expected to change. An heir approaching retirement within the ten years, for instance, might weight larger withdrawals toward the lower-income later years, while one whose income is climbing might prefer to draw more early.
The interplay with annual requirements adds a further wrinkle. When the deceased had already started their own distributions, an heir cannot simply plan around income; a minimum must come out each year regardless, and the beneficiary then decides only how much beyond that minimum to withdraw. Missing one of those mandated yearly amounts exposes the heir to the same excise penalty that applies to any skipped required distribution, turning a paperwork lapse into a real cost layered on top of the ordinary tax already due.
What the rule ultimately removed is the ability to treat an inherited IRA as a multi-generational tax shelter. The account must now be consumed within a decade, and for many heirs the real decision is no longer whether to pay the tax but how to arrange the timing so the ten-year deadline does not collide with their own highest-earning years and quietly inflate the total owed. Getting the sequence wrong does not just cost a bracket or two; it can surrender a meaningful share of an inheritance that took a parent a lifetime to build, which is why the ten-year clock rewards attention far more than it punishes patience.
This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed against primary sources by The Money Overview editorial team.
More Financial Reading
