On August 19, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service proposed a rule that would treat the refunded share of four tax credits as a federal public benefit under a 1996 welfare law, for the first time in the credits’ history. The change would strip an estimated 200,000 to 700,000 filers of a refund check, by barring anyone who is not a citizen, national or “qualified alien” from collecting the cash-back share of the earned income, child, American opportunity or adoption credit. Treasury projects $700 million to $2.6 billion in savings for 2026 alone, but only if the proposal survives a comment period closing October 5 and a public hearing set for October 14.
A 1996 Welfare Law Finds a New Target in the Tax Code
Congress passed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act in 1996 to bar most non-citizens from federal welfare programs, but for three decades neither Treasury nor the IRS classified individual income tax credits as one of those benefits. That changed with the proposed regulations issued August 19, which rest on a Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel opinion concluding that the refunded portion of the credits, the part exceeding a filer’s actual tax bill that arrives as a check, meets the 1996 law’s definition of a federal public benefit.
IRS Chief Executive Frank Bisignano framed the change as a matter of ensuring “federally funded benefits are reserved for eligible taxpayers,” while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the government would no longer let ineligible filers “collect taxpayer-funded benefits” that Congress restricted to citizens and qualified aliens. Both officials cast the proposal as enforcement of an existing statute rather than a new restriction, since PRWORA has applied to other federal benefit programs since 1996.
The distinction between a credit and its refunded share matters because most of these credits do double duty. A filer’s tax liability is reduced first, and only the leftover amount, the sum that would otherwise be paid out in cash, is redefined as the benefit now at risk. A taxpayer barred from the refunded share under the proposal could still use the non-refundable share of the same credit to reduce a tax bill to zero, since PRWORA has never restricted offsets against a filer’s own liability. The regulations, if finalized, would apply to tax years ending on or after the date a final rule is published, not the date it was proposed, so no refund currently on file is affected.
Free retirement updates: Miss an enrollment or claim deadline and it may be gone. Our free Retirement Shield newsletter keeps readers ahead of the ones that matter. Get the free newsletter.
Four Credits, One Narrow Definition of Eligibility
The proposal reaches four credits that collectively touched roughly 24 million returns in recent filing years. The earned income tax credit, worth up to $8,046 for a filer with three or more qualifying children in the 2025 tax year, carries the largest refundable pool of the group. The child tax credit runs up to $2,200 per child, with up to $1,700 of that refundable as the additional child tax credit; the American opportunity credit for education costs tops out at $2,500, of which 40%, or $1,000, is refundable; and the adoption credit, worth up to $17,280 per child for 2025, now carries a $5,000 refundable slice added by last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
To keep the refunded portion under the proposed rule, a filer must be a U.S. citizen, a U.S. national, or a “qualified alien,” a PRWORA term covering lawful permanent residents, asylees, refugees and certain other narrowly defined categories, but excluding pending asylum applicants, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients and holders of Temporary Protected Status. On a joint return only one spouse needs to meet that bar, and every filer claiming the refunded amount would attest to eligibility on the return itself, under penalty of perjury, rather than submit separate supporting documentation.
That structure leaves mixed-status households with the most exposure, since a household where one spouse holds a Social Security number and the other files with an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number could see its refund shrink depending on which spouse’s status controls the claim. The rule leaves the Affordable Care Act’s premium tax credit untouched, because Treasury noted Congress had already written separate immigration restrictions into that program, but it applies to all four credits it does name regardless of how long a household has filed jointly under the earlier rules.
The Comment Clock Before Any Refund Actually Moves
Nothing changes for the returns most filers already submitted this year. Treasury and the IRS are accepting written comments and hearing requests through October 5, with the public hearing itself set for October 14, and the agencies have committed to weighing that input before drafting a final rule. If the regulation is finalized before the end of 2026, it would apply to tax years ending on or after the publication date, which would put 2026 returns filed in early 2027 within scope; a later finalization would push the effective date back a full filing season.
The rule’s own regulatory analysis puts the stakes at 200,000 to 700,000 affected filers, fewer than 3% of the roughly 24 million taxpayers who claim these credits, against projected federal savings of $700 million to $2.6 billion in 2026 alone. That wide range shows how much depends on enforcement mechanics the proposal has not yet settled, including whether the IRS will cross-check self-attested eligibility against Department of Homeland Security records or rely solely on the perjury declaration printed on the return.
The question the comment period is meant to resolve is not whether Congress can restrict welfare-style benefits to citizens and qualified aliens — PRWORA settled that in 1996 — but whether a refundable tax credit is legally the same thing as a benefit check, a reclassification Treasury and the IRS avoided making for three decades. The proposal follows a February 2025 executive order and last year’s restrictions on Medicaid, Medicare and food-assistance eligibility for non-citizens, and how the agencies answer that legal question this fall will determine whether the same reclassification reaches the 2026 filing season or stalls at the comment stage.
This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
More Financial Reading
