Skip to main content

The Money Overview

Many nonspouse heirs must empty an inherited IRA within 10 years, and some owe yearly withdrawals along the way

An inherited IRA can carry two clocks at once. Many adult children and other nonspouse beneficiaries must drain the account by the end of the tenth year after the owner’s death. If the owner had already reached the point when required minimum distributions applied, those beneficiaries generally cannot leave the money untouched until year 10; annual withdrawals continue during the intervening years. The account’s tax character, the owner’s age at death and the beneficiary’s relationship decide the schedule before investment strategy enters the discussion.

The owner’s required beginning date controls the path through year 10

Current IRS Publication 590-B says a designated beneficiary who is not an eligible designated beneficiary generally must complete distributions within 10 years after the owner’s death. That category often includes an adult child. A surviving spouse, a minor child of the owner, a disabled or chronically ill person, and someone not more than 10 years younger may qualify for different treatment.

The owner’s required beginning date supplies the critical second fact. When the owner died before that date, a beneficiary under the 10-year rule can generally choose the timing within the decade, provided the account is empty by the final December 31. When the owner died on or after that date, the beneficiary generally calculates annual life-expectancy distributions and still empties the remaining balance by year 10.

The IRS RMD FAQ also separates the year-of-death distribution from later beneficiary withdrawals. If the owner had an unfinished RMD, the beneficiary generally must complete it. That payment does not restart the 10-year period or replace the following year’s calculation. The first records to obtain are therefore the death certificate, prior year-end balance and evidence of distributions already taken.


Free retirement updates: Miss an enrollment or claim deadline and it may be gone. Our free Retirement Shield newsletter keeps readers ahead of the ones that matter. Get the free newsletter.

A minimum withdrawal can still leave a large final-year tax bill

The federal final RMD regulations resolved years of uncertainty over whether annual withdrawals continue inside the 10-year window. Yet compliance with the annual minimum does not guarantee a smooth tax result. A life-expectancy amount may be small enough that a substantial balance remains for year 10, forcing a much larger taxable distribution at the deadline.

Traditional inherited IRA withdrawals generally enter gross income except for any basis attributable to nondeductible contributions. A large final distribution can overlap with wages, pension income, capital gains or Social Security. It can also raise modified adjusted gross income used later for Medicare income-related premiums. The better withdrawal pace may therefore be larger than the legal minimum in a beneficiary’s temporarily low-income years.

An inherited Roth IRA can face a distribution deadline even when qualified withdrawals are tax-free. That difference is easy to miss: tax treatment and depletion timing are separate questions. The absence of current income tax does not make an inherited Roth permanent. Leaving the account invested longer may be attractive, but the beneficiary still needs a plan to satisfy the applicable final deadline.

The penalty for a missed RMD makes classification more than a planning exercise. Federal law can impose an excise tax on the shortfall, although a timely correction can reduce the rate and reasonable-cause relief may be available. A beneficiary who assumes no annual payment is due may discover the error years later. Written advice should identify both the owner’s required beginning date and the regulation used for the conclusion.

Beneficiary status must be settled before money moves

Spouses have choices that ordinary nonspouse heirs do not, including treating an inherited IRA as their own in appropriate circumstances. Trusts require a separate analysis because the trust’s terms and look-through requirements can change which distribution rule applies. An estate or charity is not treated like a named individual. A custodian’s generic “10-year rule” notice cannot substitute for identifying the actual beneficiary category.

Nonspouse beneficiaries also cannot roll an inherited distribution into their own IRA in the ordinary way. Moving the account between custodians generally requires a properly titled trustee-to-trustee transfer that preserves inherited status. A check paid directly to the beneficiary can become a taxable distribution that cannot be put back, turning an administrative shortcut into an irreversible income event.

The most useful plan shows every deadline on one page: any remaining year-of-death RMD, each annual amount that applies, and the December 31 date at the end of year 10. A parallel tax projection can test taking only the minimum against deliberate larger withdrawals. The final regulations make the schedule clearer, but they also remove the illusion that “within 10 years” always means “wait nine years and decide later.”

Successor beneficiaries can inherit the original clock rather than receiving a fresh decade. If the first beneficiary dies in year six, the next person may have only the remaining years to finish the account, along with any annual rule that continues. Naming a successor and keeping the death-year calculation with the IRA records therefore protects more than estate administration. It preserves the facts needed to avoid an accidental distribution failure after another death.

Investment allocation should follow that shortening schedule. Cash needed for a near-term annual distribution should not depend entirely on selling a volatile holding at year-end, while money not needed until later can remain invested. The beneficiary’s withdrawal plan and portfolio are therefore one decision: the legal calendar determines when liquidity must exist, and the tax projection determines whether creating more liquidity earlier is economically useful.

This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by The Money Overview editorial team.

More Financial Reading

Avatar photo

Daniel Harper

Daniel is a finance writer covering personal finance topics including budgeting, credit, and beginner investing. He began his career contributing to his Substack, where he covered consumer finance trends and practical money topics for everyday readers. Since then, he has written for a range of personal finance blogs and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, straightforward content that helps readers make more informed financial decisions.​