The Federal Trade Commission is warning that scammers are specifically targeting people who have already lost money to fraud once, promising to recover the stolen funds for an upfront fee and then simply stealing again. The agency calls these operators “the worst of the absolute worst” because they buy lists of confirmed fraud victims and use the person’s own history against them. For anyone who has already been burned by a scam, the warning matters because the follow-up call can sound more official — and more convincing — than the original one ever did.
How the scam works, from lost-list buyer to fake helper
According to the FTC, refund and recovery scammers purchase lists of people who have already been defrauded, then contact those individuals claiming they can get the lost money — or the prize or merchandise that was never delivered — returned to them. To sound credible, the caller may claim to represent a government agency, even the FTC itself, a consumer advocacy group, or a law firm, none of which is true.
The pitch typically asks for a “retainer fee,” a “processing fee” or an “administrative charge” before any money supposedly moves, or it asks the victim to hand over financial account information so the recovery agent can “deposit” the refund directly. Anyone who pays loses that money outright, and anyone who shares account details risks a second layer of harm: identity theft built on top of the original financial loss.
The scheme works precisely because it targets people who are primed to believe a refund is possible. Someone who already lost savings to a fake investment or a romance scam wants the story to end with the money coming back, and a caller who already knows the details of what happened — pulled from a purchased victim list — can sound like they are following up on a real case rather than starting a new con.
These lists circulate specifically because fraud data has value on its own. A person who fell for one scam is, statistically, more likely to fall for a second pitch that mimics the shape of an official follow-up, which is why the FTC frames recovery scams as a distinct category worth naming rather than folding into general fraud advice — the targeting mechanism, not just the pitch, is what makes it dangerous.
Free retirement updates: A quiet rule change can shrink your Social Security or Medicare check, and no one warns you. The free Retirement Shield newsletter catches these early and tells you what to do. Get it free.
The one fact that exposes every version of this scam
The FTC’s guidance boils down to a single test that holds regardless of how official the caller sounds: no legitimate government agency or consumer organization ever asks for payment, or for financial information, in exchange for help recovering money that was already lost. Any request for an upfront fee before a refund arrives is, by itself, proof that the person on the phone is not who they claim to be.
The agency’s own refund and recovery scams guide recommends treating any unsolicited recovery pitch the same way regardless of the caller’s claimed title — search the person’s name and organization online alongside words like “complaint,” “scam” or “review,” and look up any agency’s real contact information independently rather than calling a number the caller supplies. A legitimate agency will never object to a person hanging up and calling back through a number found on the agency’s own website.
That verification step matters most for anyone contacted out of the blue, since a recovery scammer’s entire pitch depends on the target acting quickly, before there is time to check the story against an independent source.
What to do if a second payment already went out
Anyone who has already paid a recovery scammer still has options, though the odds of getting that specific payment back depend heavily on how it was sent. The FTC’s guide on what to do after being scammed walks through the steps for disputing a wire transfer, a gift card payment or a bank transaction, along with which of those payment types can realistically be reversed and which typically cannot.
The agency also urges anyone who paid a scammer, or who was contacted by one, to file a report at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. That report does not guarantee a personal refund, but the FTC uses the aggregated data to identify active scam operations and build cases — the same kind of pattern-matching that let the agency describe recovery scams as a distinct, named threat in the first place.
The clearest protection is preventive rather than reactive: treating any unsolicited call about a past loss with the same skepticism that, in hindsight, would have stopped the original scam. A real refund from a real settlement or enforcement action arrives through a process the recipient did not have to pay to enter — which is precisely the test that exposes a recovery scam before a second payment ever leaves the account.
Family members handling finances for an older relative can apply the same test from a distance: if a parent or spouse mentions a call about “getting the money back” from a scam reported months earlier, the request for a fee up front is the detail worth asking about first, before any other part of the story.
This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
More Financial Reading
